Fleminger, S. (2003). Head injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: The evidence 10 years on; a partial replication. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 74(7), 857-862. doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.7.857
 Kuźma, E. et al., (2018). Stroke and dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Abstract]. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 14(11), 1416-1426. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3061.
Sen, A., Capelli, V., & Husain, M. (2018). Cognition and dementia in older patients with epilepsy. Brain, 141(6), 1592-1608. doi:10.1093/brain/awy022
 Chan, V. et al., (2013). Older Adults with Acquired Brain Injury: Outcomes After Inpatient Rehabilitation. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 32(3), 278-286. doi:10.1017/s0714980813000317
 Chan, V., Zagorski, B., Parsons, D., & Colantonio, A. (2013). Article 19 Older Adults with Acquired Brain Injury: Functional Independence Measures after Inpatient Rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(10). doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.037, and;
Chan, V., Zagorski, B., Parsons, D., & Colantonio, A. (2013). Older Adults with Acquired Brain Injury: Outcomes After Inpatient Rehabilitation. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 32(3), 278-286. doi:10.1017/s0714980813000317
 Thompson, H. J., et al.,(2006). Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Future Implications. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(10), 1590-1595. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00894.x
 Testa, J. A., et al.,(2005). Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: Effects of Aging on Recovery. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(9), 1815-1823. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.010
Disclaimer: There is no shortage of web-based online medical diagnostic tools, self-help or support groups, or sites that make unsubstantiated claims around diagnosis, treatment and recovery. Please note these sources may not be evidence-based, regulated or moderated properly and it is encouraged individuals seek advice and recommendations regarding diagnosis, treatment and symptom management from a regulated healthcare professional such as a physician or nurse practitioner. Individuals should be cautioned about sites that make any of the following statements or claims that:
- The product or service promises a quick fix
- Sound too good to be true
- Are dramatic or sweeping and are not supported by reputable medical and scientific organizations.
- Use of terminology such as “research is currently underway” or “preliminary research results” which indicate there is no current research.
- The results or recommendations of product or treatment are based on a single or small number of case studies and has not been peer-reviewed by external experts
- Use of testimonials from celebrities or previous clients/patients that are anecdotal and not evidence-based
Always proceed with caution and with the advice of your medical team.